Responsible technology

Athlete privacy and coach visibility should be designed together

A useful coach view does not require exposing every athlete detail.

Scope note

This article provides general performance-education information. It is not medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or clearance to train or compete.

More visibility is not always better

Performance systems can collect personal information across training, recovery, nutrition, and communication. Giving every stakeholder access to every field weakens purpose boundaries and can discourage honest athlete input.

Purpose and permission

The better question is what a coach needs for the specific decision. Access should be linked to a role and purpose rather than treated as permanent visibility. The IOC Athletes’ Declaration identifies privacy and data protection as athlete rights.

The Atlas boundary

Atlas PI’s philosophy is to support the athlete while respecting the coach. Coach Workspace should surface signals needed for the agreed performance context without implying unrestricted access to health details or replacing confidential professional relationships.

Key takeaways

  • Show only what the role and decision require.
  • Make recency, source, and permission visible.
  • Trust is part of monitoring quality.

Sources and further reading

  1. IOC Athletes’ Declaration implementation guide
  2. The Ethics of AI in Sport